About buywebsitetraffic.io
One question, answered with figures a buyer can check before spending anything: where website traffic is sold, what it costs to get in, and which numbers survive a look at the funding screen.
Last reviewed 30 July 2026
The one question this site answers
This site keeps a single comparison current — eight self-serve advertising platforms that will sell you website traffic, ranked on the price of getting through the door rather than on how loudly each one markets itself. The reader it is written for has a landing page, a budget somewhere between one and three hundred dollars, and no reliable way to tell an advertising network from a vendor reselling sessions. Everything published here exists to make that distinction cheap and quick to draw.
Entry cost is the ordering axis for two reasons. It is the only figure a buyer can confirm before money moves, and it governs how many mistakes a starting budget can absorb: a platform opening at thirty dollars funds five attempts where a hundred-dollar threshold funds one and a half.
Where the coverage stops
Three areas sit outside the remit, and marking them plainly is more useful than implying thin coverage is full coverage.
- Flat-price visit bundles. They are explained on the front page as a category and priced as arithmetic, but they are never ranked beside auction inventory. Placing them in the same league table would imply the two are interchangeable products, which they are not.
- Search, social and influencer channels. Each is a legitimate route to visitors and none belongs in a table about programmatic supply bought through an auction.
- Anything done on a reader's behalf. No account is operated here, no creative is produced, no bid is entered, and no vendor is introduced privately.
Where verification is impossible the gap is labelled instead of hidden. A spread with no clearing evidence behind it is called a spread; a figure lifted from a vendor's own published rates says so at the point where it is used. The rules that decide which of those a number qualifies as are set out in the tier system.
Who writes it
Editorial responsibility sits with Christoph Trappe, whose background is content strategy rather than daily media buying. That boundary is real and it is written down rather than glossed over: his role, and the subjects on which he defers to the people who trade daily, are set out on his own page.
Who pays for it
The site carries a commercial relationship with one of the platforms it covers, and every outbound link to that platform is tagged so the traffic can be attributed. The shape of that relationship is written out under advertising disclosure, along with a short list of decisions it has no access to.
Chief among those: the running order. Positions follow published minimum deposits ascending, which is arithmetic rather than opinion, and anyone can reproduce it in ten minutes against eight funding screens. If a reader ever reruns that sum and gets a different order, that is a defect and it should be reported. Where to send it is a single address, and anyone planning to republish what they find here should read the reuse conditions first.